Amazing Questions
AMAZING
ANSWERS
(By Joseph Fielding
McConkie, from his book, 50 Truths).
Can Common Ground Be
Sacred Ground? (page 117)
1. The single greatest
heresy in missionary work is the idea that we seek common ground with those we
teach. Anytime a missionary tells an investigator that we share common
ground he or she has testified against the need for the Restoration.
Joseph and Hyrum Smith did not die in Carthage Jail to assure that we could
believe in the same things everyone else already believed….Ours is not common
ground, it is sacred ground. It is where the heavens open and the God of
heaven speaks.
Can True Religion Ask
For Less Than Our Best? (page 125)
2. All churches would
like to have their members pay tithing, but they do not do so because their
members do not have the faith to pay it. In like manner, they would like
to be able to send out missionaries like ours but they cannot. They
simply do not have the faith among their numbers to get that many young men and
young women with the faith to accept a call to serve at their own expense
wherever they might be sent to serve for a required time.
Other churches would
like to introduce our family home evening program and our visiting and home
teaching programs, along with a host of other programs, but they do not because
they simply do not have the faith to make them work. The key to salvation is not in believing
in Christ but in following him. It is found in doing, not professing.
True worship consists of believing as God believes,
thinking as God thinks and doing as God would do. It consists of
countless things we do to bless others and it refines our souls in the process.
Why does the cause of
truth always attract scoundrels? (page 128)
3. The great matter
and the heart of our message does not center in translation but transmission.
Our concern is with
the plain and precious things that have been taken from it. They have
been restored to us by the score in the Book of Mormon as well as in the Pearl
of Great Price and the Doctrine and Covenants.
If the Bible had not
been tampered with in significant ways, we would not need the Book of
Mormon. No commentary will ever be written that sustains the Bible with
power and prophecy the way the Book of Mormon does. There are not anti-Book of Mormon
arguments that are not at the same time anti-Bible arguments. There are
no anti-Joseph Smith arguments that are not at the same time anti-Jesus Christ
arguments.
Every gospel doctrine
is greeted by the adversary with a counter doctrine. All gospel principles
and practices have their counterfeit. The only church whose doctrines and
practices have remained unchanged from dispensation to dispensation was
restored to us by the Prophet Joseph Smith. Ours is not a new religion but a restoration of the faith of the
ancients.
Is Tampering With the Bible Alive and Well? (page
136)
4.
As rendered in the King James Version used by Latter-day Saints today,
John 3:16 reads, “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting
life.”
Then the great change came. In modern translations, such as the New
International Version or the Revised Standard Version, you would be hard
pressed to find such a rendering of the verse.
The text is translated so it reads, “God so loved the world that he gave
his ‘only son’ or his ‘one and only son’ that he should not perish. The word ‘begotten’ is omitted.
The idea that Christ is the begotten
Son of God does not square with the creeds of men. It clearly implies that God is an actual
being, that he is in reality a father and the Jesus of Nazareth is actually his
Son.
At the same time that it robs God of
his personhood, his fatherhood and Christ of his rightful place as the child
born of God to Mary, it destroys the plan of salvation.
No longer do we have a Son who
inherited the power of life from his immortal father, or a Son who also had the
power to lay down his life and take it up again. This omission thus destroys the doctrine
of the Atonement and the resurrection.
This subtle change in text robs all of
us of the claim to being the spirit sons and daughters of God and of the
attendant hope of resurrection. Thus
this text captures how the creeds of men have taken so much of life and meaning
out of the Bible and have thereby dramatized the reality of a universal
apostasy and the need for a restoration of all things.
What is Hell’s favorite doctrine? (page
151)
5. Given that the principles of the
gospel are everlastingly the same, the arguments against those principles
remain the same also. Standing opposite
the principle of continuous revelation, for instance, is the doctrine of sufficiency. The doctrine of sufficiency holds that what
has been given in the past is sufficient and thus the heavens are sealed to
additional light and knowledge.
One arguing for this doctrine would
likely say, “My father plowed fields with the aid of a horse, read by the light
of a candle and had no indoor plumbing.
It was good enough for those who lived generations before and it is good
enough for us today.”
To deny the need for continuous
revelation to give life and meaning to current revelation is to deny the light
of the sun to the spring planting. It is
to reduce revelation to black ink on white paper. When the God of heaven chooses to erase those
principles he personally espoused or to invite their re-reading through creeds
written by councils of men, you may know of a surety that you no longer have
possession of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Hell’s favorite doctrine is that the
heavens are sealed and that God has no need to speak to us in our day.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home