Subtle Clues
Subtle Clues of the
Book of Mormon Truthfulness (emphasis added)
By Taylor
Halverson (Ph.D., biblical studies), a BYU teaching and learning consultant. He
wrote the following:
“The Book of
Mormon provides many small or subtle clues that are relevant to its
authenticity as an ancient record. The story of Nephi’s confrontation with
Laban and the story of Teancum contain some of these often unnoticed,
yet relevantly essential details.
A reader of
the Book of Mormon might ask, “How is it after the death of Laban, Nephi put on
his clothes and Zoram didn’t see what a mess the clothes were? Shouldn’t that
have tipped Zoram off that something was out of place, that there was a
problem?”
This is a great
question.
What is
significant are the small details that are found in the Book of Mormon and that
are easy to overlook. Particularly intriguing is that we hear on occasion Book
of Mormon authors saying that they are careful not to include extraneous
details in the record.
So, why the
apparently extraneous details? Because upon closer inspection, we
see that these details matter to the truthfulness of the story.
When Nephi
encountered Laban, we learn that Laban was drunk (1 Nephi 4:7). If Laban’s
clothes were later visible to Zoram, then perhaps if he did see any blood on
the clothes he may have mistook it for spilled wine. More likely is that the darkness of night
meant Zoram couldn’t see a thing. No
amount of blood-stained clothes would be visible in the darkness of an ancient
Jerusalem night.
That is one
fact that modern people don’t typically appreciate, how truly dark nighttime is
without artificial light.
And how do
we know that it was night? Nephi includes as a small detail, almost as an
afterthought, this seemingly innocuous statement as he narrates his entry into
the city.
“And it
was by night; and I caused that they should hide themselves without
the walls. And after they had hid themselves, I, Nephi, crept into the city and
went forth towards the house of Laban” (1 Nephi 4:5, emphasis added).
Nephi’s
confrontation with Laban is one of many stories in the Book of Mormon that
contains subtle, yet essential clues to the authenticity of
the Book of Mormon.
Consider
another creeping-by-night story. At the end of chapter 51 in the Book of Alma,
we hear the story of the Nephite general Teancum going forth at night to seek
out Amalickiah, the opposing general in the Lamanite army. Teancum finds the
tent of Amalickiah and assassinates him with a javelin. Successfully returning
to his camp, Teancum wakes his soldiers and has them stand ready to battle.
What many of
us miss, however, are some important calendric details. They appear at the
beginning of the next chapter:
‘And now, it
came to pass in the twenty and sixth year of the reign of the judges over the
people of Nephi, behold, when the Lamanites awoke on the first morning of the
first month, behold, they found Amalickiah was dead in his own
tent; and they also saw that Teancum was ready to give them battle on that day.
And now,
when the Lamanites saw this they were affrighted’ (Alma
52:1-2, emphasis added).
Notice that
it is the first day of the first month — New Year’s Day. Why does
Mormon occupy any space on the plates with dates? And why should we care? In
the ancient Near Eastern culture, which likely influenced Book of Mormon
culture, New Year’s Day was the time when the king of the land would sally
forth to demonstrate his vitality and liveliness to successfully rule as a king
for another year. The rising forth of the king on this day was like a divine
foreshadowing of a prosperous year. A dead king was the sure sign of a
disastrous future.
Hence, no
act could be more psychologically demoralizing to an opposing army than to find
their king dead on New Year’s Day. Teancum chose New Year’s Eve to
assassinate Amalickiah. He sought to win a massive psychological victory
against the Lamanites by sending a message of disaster, despair and fear.
The seemingly small
details in the text of the Book of Mormon matter. In narrative context, they signify
the authenticity of the Book of Mormon as an ancient text.”
(Taylor
Halverson, Ph.D., biblical studies, instructional tech is a BYU teaching &
learning consultant; founder of Creativity,
Innovation & Design Group; and travel leader to Mesoamerica and
Middle East. Taylorhalverson.com. His views are his own. Printed in the 1 Jan
2015 Deseret News)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home